Are we going to see other improvements with performance on the Shield with regards to RetroArch? What about the sound lag that Android 4.3 was supposedly able to bring down to somewhat more manageable levels? .[/quote]
You should take that up with Nvidia and Google, not me. Queryable frames per buffer still reports 1024 and ‘feature low audio latency’ still reports ‘no’, so it still sucks.
But then again Android audio latency sucks major-league in general compared to iOS. Sorry but it is the way it is. Perhaps if less Android fanboys start making pathetic excuses for the amateurish piece of dogshit company called Google, they could maybe get their shit together out of embarrassment and offer you something onpar with iOS. But as long as fanboys make their excuses for them, they can rest on their laurels knowing very well nobody is holding their feet to the fire.[/quote]
It’s the info on this thread that turned me on to the Mad Catz M.O.J.O. It shares a Tegra 4 processor and 2 gb of ram, like the shield. The only differences is sans a touch screen. It’s like an OUYA but with better internals.
Just wondering if I should expect similar performance? The only drag is that it’s on 4.2.2. But it’s routable now. Should I put a custom 4.3 or even 4.4 custom rom to enjoy some of the OPEN GL performance gains, that are mentioned on the N64 core, for instance?
Just wondering what people think, as far as how the unit I’m investing in should compare to that of the NVIDIA shield since they seem on paper to be very similar. Thanks for any feedback you guys can offer me! 
