Same thing that motivates all of us I suppose, making the games look the way they’re supposed to. I only use 3-4 presets for my personal use, depends on the system.
1 Like
That’s not my point, taking a sentence out of context does not make you right. Or do you see me saying that scanline doesn’t disappear on crt? That is not my point. My point is that on crt you have 240p… And at no point do you get a raw upscaled image like on modern tv and scanline emule, because crt has the pixels where they should be. Behind a mask, in 240p with scanline…but on crt the mask does not disappear it is hardware on crt… Anyway I’m not going to repeat what I said in my message. So I post my message, where what I say, is not what you want me to say… As if I didn’t know that my crt has scanlines in 240p (because my tv is 480i, and in 240p it combines this thing with scanlines…) which are themselves almost invisible because horizontal scanlines are cut by the mask aperture (which has vertical rvb lines perpendicular to the scanline…) That’s why I can provide you with links where many people don’t see their scanline, but rather their mask and phosphor triad on a sony aperture crt, which is not the case with pvm, bvm… Which you can see scanline at 10 meters. See you soon. Ex
I posted screenshots above of my crt and street fighter alpha. At normal distance and on a white background too, right? You should see the scanline right? Well it’s not the case… Can I zoom in on another picture? No scanline visible either, you see the mask… ( you even answered that you didn’t think that the grid was really a grid )… So to illustrate my point simply. 3 pictures, and fix your attenton on the bottom right green background… And tell me honestly where the scanlines are most visible? Bvm ? Pvm? Or sony kv?
You even lose details on the green background because of the scanline… There are two small dark green spots (like 2 small bushes or leaves) on bvm almost completely hidden by big scanlines… And on the sony kv? That’s where you see the most details…well that’s why I play on sony kv… Because more precise in detail, more round and softer than a bvm or pvm… Because who says more lines bvm 900 lines for example and much more your scanline will be visible in 240p… You tell me 480i / 240p filled by the scanline… And well bvm? Bigger scanline because capable of more than 480i because it can even take 480p… That’s the truth, all ct’s have scanline… But not at all visible and perceived in the same way… A sony kv doesn’t have and will never have a visible scanline when you are more than 1 meter away… Who plays with his nose glued to the screen on his sony kv to try to discern scanline mixed with a mask? That’s my point…I hope I was clearer this time my friend…
Here you are placed at a normal viewing distance, what do my eyes see? Are they the same as you looking at the picture, or do you see scanlines? Realize that here is a plain white background… And that you don’t see any scanlines… so how can you see them on another color darker than white? No it’s not the reality, on 10 pictures that I can take you don’t see any scanline… To see them in pictures, I’ll have to tilt the tv, take a picture with a certain shutter of the camera…basically I’ll spend more time than normal to capture these in pictures… But at one meter I take a lot of pictures? Only 1 photo out of 100 will have succeeded in capturing these…but 99% of my photos will not have a visible scanline. And so a human has eyes like the camera lens, what the camera captures is what my eyes see. That’s all.
Same game 3 user pictures…
Do they try not to capture their scanline? Is that what you think?
Yet you are close enough to discern them right?
Or is it a conspiracy? And the photographers erase their scanline from their photos with adobe photoshop.
Yes it’s quite easy to manipulate camera focus to make scanlines disappear in photos.
This is all very tiresome though. The scanlines are absolutely visible in the shots of SFA3 that you posted earlier. I’m honestly baffled that you think they aren’t visible.
So much misinformation in this post that I’m not even going to bother. Someone better go inform all the Trinitron users that scanlines aren’t visible from 1 meter away, lol. It’s a mass delusion.
Where? Dude these are facts we’re talking about, not some fringe unknown science or personal opinions. An aperture grille CRT does not have staggered lines as in the preset shots you initially posted. Honestly I think you’re misinterpreting things due to a language barrier issue, I’ve tried to be as accurate and precise in my language as possible to avoid that, but you’re putting words in my mouth and it’s damn irritating.
This thread is getting seriously derailed, could you do us a favor and move this discussion to a new thread?
3 Likes
What is tiring is that you confuse not seeing with not existing. The air exists but you don’t see it, like the scanline you keep saying that I say the scanline doesn’t exist? While I say they are necessarily present but invisible to 90% in normal use. I also post a link where there are debates on this subject, where sony users say like me… The scanline exists on sony but mixed with the mask, what you see is plain white, bright and vivid colors, and no big scanline bvm style… You have trouble understanding the nuance? Not me… So I’ll say it one more time SCANLINES EXIST ON CRT, BUT WON’T BE AS VISIBLE ON SONY KVM DUE TO ITS MASK APERTURE. THE PROOF IN PICTURES YOU SEE MORE WHITE THAN BLACK OF THE SCANLINE. AT NORMAL VIEWING DISTANCE.
And the forum if it discusses this, even stating that on crt arcade you don’t see as much scanline as you might think, it is indeed a reality, which you deny, so all the humans who still own crt sony trinitron are telling lies? Are they tampering with photos and deleting scanlines? No, this is not true. These are users who share photos of their TVs and post their photos. And other users say, eh! But we do not even see your scanline on your crt… And you as you know that the crt have scanline, because of their technology, you claim to see them even if they are only 1% visible on the picture… If you see 50% black scanline instead of a plain white one??? That’s not my problem. And it doesn’t mean that they don’t exist, it just means that they are mixed with the mask and not as visible as on bvm, and on pvm,
and I posted the proof in pictures…that you also deny… 3 photos at 4 cm from the TV, bvm pvm, vs sony kv… The same camera The same user the same game 3 different rendering and where you discern the most scanline is on bvm… You deny this point? You are wrong, it is the reality that any human can experience by switching from a low tv crt, and the same game on bvm. Yours in respect of the truth. See you soon The end for me.
Plot twist; I owned like 6 of them as recently as a couple years ago, from 20” to 32”. Had an entire garage full of ‘em. Used them as a reference when tweaking shaders. Scanlines were clearly visible on all of them from 6 ft away.
I’ll direct your attention to the following quote:
…
I read the thread you linked to. It’s hilarious. One user (SeanMcL) posted the following summary:
OP: You know those lines we all see? They aren’t there. KLOV:Yuh huh. OP: Nuh uh. KLOV: Yuh huh. OP: Weird technological hair splitting KLOV: Additional technological hair splitting Me: Pointless post. Spoiler Alert, don’t read next part
At the end of this thread: Everyone leaves thinking the same thing they thought when they first read the thread title.
(You’re welcome, I’m just here to help)
1 Like
I’m struck by how remarkably similar the scanlines are in each of these shots. The biggest difference I see is the coarseness of the mask.
Makes sense, you have 3 different screen sizes, the BVM is the smallest and the KV is the biggest.
5 Likes
Does anyone have popcorn?
1 Like
Both of you are clearly very knowledgeable and passionate in the field. I don’t think it’s a language barrier issue. It’s just possible that both @Nesguy and @Brainbin74 have different thresholds for what they describe and perceive as visible scanlines. So maybe at the point @Brainbin74 considers the scanlines to effectively be invisible, @Nesguy is referring to that same type of image as one that still has scanlines.
One thing that we can all agree on is that scanlines, masks and shader effects make pixel graphics great again! So we all can agree to disagree because nothing we say will change fact. We might just perceive and express our perception of the same facts slightly differently. So sometimes instead of sticking to terminology maybe it might be better to just try to describe what one is speaking about because people might tend to hold onto their knowledge and definition of terminology. So instead of scanlines just say I can see less black lines between the image. Or the black lines are hardly noticeable at a certain distance on a certain set. Or, perhaps in my opinion, it seems as if the mask, masks the appearance of the horizontal black lines and what we end up seeing is a more grid-like pattern than an image that is composed primarily of alternating coloured and dark horizontal lines. Remember, some are accustomed to NTSC, some are accustomed to SECAM so it’s hard to see what another sees. As a young man, I could see flicker at 60Hz on a CRT monitor, while most other people I knew couldn’t tell the difference. So discuss and lets learn and share. That’s why we have so many presets in the shader packages, there’s no one right way to display and enjoy the games.
4 Likes
I have nothing to add you have understood everything That’s two times we share the same opinion, and you understood perfectly my messages, my explanations, with photos to support them, and links that I provide… The forum on scanline is not mine, I am not registered there. Just people who share photos, and we see it well … So the debate yes but in respect, it is our passion and therefore leads to debates of passionate… No violence here, just sharing of life, and knowledge Long live the scanline long live the shader and crt rest in peace…
1 Like
So this thread will be a must. Photos documentation testimonial. I’m starting. Where do you see the most scanline? Or is it all the same to you? Personally my TV looks like the first picture on my sony trinitron… Nothing to do with the bvm, I repost another picture, because the one of the trees did not convince my friend nesguy.
Infos
But the real “killer-feature” of pro monitors is the TVLs!
The TVL or TeleVision Lines are the vertical lines delimiting the phosphor cells structuring the screen. In the case of the Trinitrons, the Aperture Grille technology orders the cells into vertical lines, and each scan of the electron gun illuminates these cells, thus reconstituting the image.
The more TVL the screen has, the more the image definition increases. Thus a traditional consumer screen had approximately 300 TVL. A high-end consumer screen like a Trinitron FD-WEGA from the 90’s had a maximum of 450 TVL. The pro monitors go much further with TVL up to 900 or even 1000 for the 16:9 versions. Be careful not to confuse TVL with the definition of the video signal! The definition like 240p, 480p, 1080p, etc. where we speak in number of scan lines, or “frame lines”, is the vertical definition, we count the horizontal lines. Similarly, when we define a standard such as NTSC, which provides for 483 display lines + 42 synchronization lines, we always talk about horizontal lines. Here we speak of the number of vertical lines structurally present at the hardware level of the screen, a little like nowadays we know the horizontal definition for a digital LCD screen (1920 for Full HD for example).
2 Likes
Convince me of what? That scanlines look different on different crts? My dude, I already said as much a few posts back, and then reposted it to reiterate the point two posts above in this thread.. And nothing I’ve posted contradicts that point. This is really all just a big misunderstanding. Somewhere along the way you got the idea that I think scanlines all look the same on all CRTs, or something. At this point I honestly don’t know what you’re arguing about.
I’ve mentioned TVL several times in past posts. I think I may have even posted that exact image with the marios before. TVL isn’t the whole story when it comes to scanlines, though. Tube size also matters. In general, larger tubes have bigger gaps between scanlines. This is how a 27" KV can have almost the same scanlines as a 14" BVM, as demonstrated in the image with the trees.
1 Like
I totally agree with you about the diagonal of the tv. That’s why my crt is a 20 inch sony crt kvm20b… And that I think I have the smallest size of the crt, and that as you say the scanlines are necessarily less present than a larger TV, and if you add the aperture technology of the mask, and the most important here to understand on my tv…
We are talking about the number of vertical lines structurally present on the screen hardware, And so? Your horizontal scanlines are cut vertically in small boxes…
And so I do not distinguish the scanlines on my crt at normal viewing distance. So when I take pictures? You can see the structure of the mask+ tvl hardware vertical lines of my crt… So that’s all I’ve been saying all along this post…
I repeat, my kv crt has no VISIBLE scanline, even if they exist… Because a horizontal scanline cut vertically by the very hardware structure of my crt… You don’t see horizontal lines, you see boxes, and phosphor triads… That’s all I’m saying, and that’s what cyber understood too… So I’m posting a link that explains why that is…because trinitron aperture has ??? We’re talking about the number of vertical lines structurally present at the hardware level of the screen, So that’s it I understand what you’re saying about the size of the tvs affecting the quality of the final image, which is logical, it’s what I call the pitch… Ex I take a plasma panasonic 42g20s because the pitch is thinner than a 65 inch tv… I take a sony kv20 crt because it’s smaller and thinner, and I take sony because it’s aperture grill, and??? Scanline less strong, less pronounced because???
We are talking about the number of vertical lines structurally present on the screen hardware,
Who imitates a sony shader that has vertical lines? Which would cut the horizontal scanline? And therefore would not show the scanlines? But just a grid??? And small box… So when I tell you I have trouble taking pictures of my scanlines, because on 100photos? Maybe by chance there is one that will have visible scanlines… But 99 pictures will have either the mask, or the grid, or even the structure… TVL We are talking about the number of vertical lines structurally present on the screen hardware, Can I add that you have ntsc 480i max in the US? Yes it is a fact. So my sony takes 576i (french and european format…) I have a better reso’ution than you, I have RGB peritel
And that the more the image has a small resolution? The less you can see the scanlines. Why?
If I play alex kidd master system? 256x192 (as the image has less horizontal points) And I repeat a third time, the very structure of my hardware TV has vertical lines… So the less horizontal line is long? The more it will be cut in small squares and the less the scanline will be visible, so? 256 horizontal will be more cut in small squares than the genesis 320*240, and that in addition if I play in 50hz?? I have black bands known by all Europe here… And that it crushes the image and therefore compresses the space of the lines even more and makes the scanline even less visible, that’s the truth of what I see, and what I saw all my childhood… I think hunterk knows what I am explaining.
And you nesguy too, right? Because here is a shader of my crt kv20… What does the creator of this shader see? It’s the hardware vertical line structure of his crt that interferes with his horizontal scanline… he can take pictures too, right? And yet he sees what? Vertical lines that cut the horizontal scanline…
Thanks always a pleasure.
Have a nice day friends.
1 Like
Yeah I think you’re assuming (or assuming that I’m assuming) that “scanlines” means solid black lines when in reality they’re just the horizontal lines formed by skipping over every other line in the raster pattern when displaying 240p. They’re definitely less pronounced in KVs vs PVMs or BVMs, but the “grid” you’re referring to is the result of the horizontal lines (scanlines) interacting with the aperture grille. If you can see a grid, you’re seeing scanlines, because you don’t have a grid without horizontal lines. The horizontal lines in the grid are the scanlines and the vertical lines are formed when one phosphor (or two) in an RGB triad are skipped over when producing a particular color, since most colors only require 1 or 2 of the 3 phosphors to be lit up.
As far as the horizontal lines not being visible to you, I don’t know what to say. I’ve owned 20” Trinitrons before and could still make out horizontal lines at 6 ft away, but they’re definitely not solid black lines as with the xVM series. And in the arcades you definitely see scanlines since you’re like 2 ft from the monitor.
As far as the PAL standard is concerned, most of these games were mastered in Japan and the “most accurate” approach would be to replicate the NTSC-J standard. This might not be the most nostalgic approach though, depending on where you grew up. I thought the cooler color temperature of NTSC-J was kinda gross until I got used to it.
3 Likes
I’m under the impression that higher-end or later CRT models that use aperture grille manifest more uniform, consistent grid pattern. Like the pattern I see from the pics posted by Brainbin74.
On older, lower-end models, the grid pattern looks more organic as it varies and reacts more dramatically to the surrounding colors. I could be imagining things but it would be nice if anyone can confirm or debunk this 
2 Likes
@Brainbin74 Mentioned to me in a previous post in another thread that he is French and they use SECAM. He gave me the whole rundown of why the SECAM system is superior to all and why I couldn’t expect him to use, be excited about or relate to the image being presented in my CyberLab Mega Bezel Death To Pixels shaders. This was partly because he had used an outdated screenshot for comparison but it was quite an interesting and enlightening exchange. I’m going to post this piece I just read that we can all use to supplement or add to the immense trove of knowledge we have about TV standards. I think it’s good to learn about the experience of people who might have experienced the same thing that we did in very different ways and as such that final image in their heads and that goal in their minds as to what constitutes their ultimate and most suitable shader preset might vary considerably from what we might envisage.
http://www.differencebetween.net/technology/protocols-formats/difference-between-ntsc-pal-and-secam/
3 Likes
This is another gem I just came across that actually briefly touches on what @Nesguy was saying about the difference in appearance of the aperture grille between different sized CRTs at the 8:45 sec. mark. Watch the whole thing if you’re a true retrogaming fan!
5 Likes
If the blur motion of lcd qled or lcd does not bother you, and that the bloom does not bother you, and not to have the same depth of black as the oled I would say that it is a good choice.
But a friend who has a qled regrets his choice after seeing my oled tv in retrogaming. It’s blurry in motion, which has nothing to do with a crt. And at his place I saw bloom halos around each white letter…in the texts, as I also saw that it didn’t have absolute blacks like the oled, for resume? He regrets his purchase for the retrogaming games.and pc games.
You say the qled have more contrast, yes it’s true, but I already find my tv too bright in hdr…
It takes some getting used to, and I told you with the bfi that I lose 40% of luminosity, and that I wasn’t even at full contrast for retroarch in rec709… I am between 70 and 80.
The rec 709 on oled uses only 120nits calibration standard, and I already have as much contrast as my sony crt,
so imagine with 10 times more contrast in hdr 1000 nits? And without the bfi?
I would have a supercharged crt, I would see at least 4 times more contrast than my crt.
So if you are playing in a garden in daylight? Yes the qled will be brighter.
But the truth is that the oled is still superior in games and movies.
This is my opinion.
And I have a 1080p plasma, a panasonic ez950 oled, and a sony crt tv to compare.
I don’t buy the qled for the flaws I mention above, it’s blurry, and I wouldn’t make a mama cab with a qled, at least not for me for sure, no thanks.
This oled is pure magic.
My tv in action
OLED can’t get bright enough for full strength masks. Try adjusting the mask strength to 100% and report back.
Also, OLED uses a WRGB subpixel structure and it’s impossible to get any masks to look right other than the black and white ones. The subpixel-respecting masks all need a three color subpixel structure (RGB, GBR, GRB, etc).
2 Likes