Of course but this is not a 100% Guarantee though. There might be a couple presets here or there for example in my CyberLab Special Edition Folder which use Background Graphics, Curvature as well as Noise and Shadow Mask which might have slightly higher performance requirements depending on the game or core and settings. Some of these can run extremely close to 100% GPU usage on my setup while similar presets in my CyberLab Neo-GX folder might run at about 91% GPU usage under the same scenarios.
Why not load them up and try them and see? The most I can share is my experience.
I haven’t tested every game and every core out there with every configuration possible.
For example I don’t play many PS1, N64 or 3D games in general and don’t usually push things like upscaling in conjunction with my Shader Presets so your mileage may vary depending on what you run and how you run it.
This is like a worst case scenario. No overclock with one of my heaviest if not my heaviest presets.
Same preset after overclock.
Similar looking but with no graphics, minimally Curved CyberLab Smooth Neo-GX Ultra Preset
I would just add that this is a single fan Mini ITX graphics card so not one with any exotic cooling or any extra beefy VRMs.
My overclock settings are MSI Afterburner Auto OC Curve Optimized GPU Overclock.
My memory OC is +200MHz. In recent times I’ve dropped that to 190MHz.
This is supposed to be within the manufacturer’s speed rating of the GDDR5 VRAM on my Graphics card if I recall correctly.
Only recently I’ve pushed the Voltage and Power Limits of my Overclock to give myself a “free” upgrade of my now ancient graphics card.






! You can see more details on this thread 
Can someone help?










