Most definitely looks good! Have you tried running these in conjunction with CPU based Video Filters like Blargg NTSC?
Also, what games are featured in those screenshots?
1 Like
I have one preset in that phone with ntsc shader and Guest.r-mini on top of that. The games are Bruce Lee Master system, I think that is a homebrew and Chaos Engine (or else Soldiers of fortune in USA) for SNES.
1 Like
DOSBOX
Shader
zfast_crt + ewa_curvature
Shader Passes: 2
Shader #0: zfast_crt_finemask.slang
Shader #0 Filter: Linear
Shader #0 Scale: 5x
Shader #1: ewa_curvature.slang
Shader #1 Filter: Linear
Shader #1 Scale: Default
Shader Parameters
Blur Amount X-Axis: 0.00
Scanline Darkness - Low: 9.00
Dark Pixel Brightness Boost: 1.40
Mask Effect Amount: 0.20
Mask/Scanline Fade: 0.30
EWA Curvature X-Axis: 0.01
EWA Curvature Y-Axis: 0.02
Mask Style: -1.00
Shader Presets
shaders = 2
shader0 = shaders_slang/crt/shaders/zfast_crt/zfast_crt_finemask.slang
filter_linear0 = "true"
scale_type_x0 = "source"
scale_x0 = "5.000000"
scale_type_y0 = "source"
scale_y0 = "5.000000"
shader1 = shaders_slang/anti-aliasing/shaders/ewa_curvature.slang
filter_linear1 = "true"
BLURSCALEX = "0.000000"
LOWLUMSCAN = "9.000000"
BRIGHTBOOST = "1.400000"
MASK_DARK = "0.200000"
MASK_FADE = "0.300000"
warpX = "0.011000"
warpY = "0.021000"
shadowMask = "-1.000000"
6 Likes
I love how in the middle of all this you just post this dry as hell scanlines only preset. NO mask, no controversy, lol. Looks good to me.
2 Likes
Reposting this here because I think the closeup is surprisingly good for how terrible this looks IRL on my crappy work monitor.
2 Likes
It looks like the real thing to me 
(except some visible LCD grid in the dark areas) But I’ll trust your words that it might not look good in normal viewing distance. Given how the forum shows the images, I believe semi-closeups (probably something like 2x zoom, not 5-10x zoom) gives you the best idea about how a preset might look like in real life. Will still be noticeably different obviously depending on the quality of the image and everyone’s monitor setup but I think semi-closeups will help reduce the discrepancies between expectations and reality for the forum users.
2 Likes
It’s very easy to get even 100% mask strength to look fantastic with the latest guest-dr-venom, using mask 0. Just a few small tweaks. Cranked up scanline saturation, some post crt brightness, adjusted the glow, crank up the scanlines a bit, and some color stuff.
(the usual disclaimer about viewing things at original size definitely applies)
2 Likes
Not going to lie, I always just max out scanline saturation (I actually can’t even with the low settings for it anymore).
1 Like
yeah the expanded range really helps when you’re using obscene post crt brightness levels.
1 Like
I checked on my screen and indeed looks pretty impressive, with mask at full strength. Awesome job again @guest.r
2 Likes
I actually think the best is to have your big eye capturing screenshot and then to have a very detailed close up shot so you can actually see what’s going on and what you might actually see with the naked eye when using the preset. Also to use standard camera settings (ISO 200, 6500K, 1/60 aperture speed) as it’s difficult to know what is the camera clipping highlights and what is a preset with bloom say.
Personally I’d like to always see a comparison shot with an actual CRT but then again a lot of shaders are artistic impressions (I suppose aren’t they all to varying degrees) which a lot of people prefer so I wouldn’t go hard-line on that.
I think the photos you posted above are the closest to what I’d like to see people shift to but are still a little too far out IMO as they hide details that you see when actually viewing the shaders.
I also think we should take a leaf out of retrogamingboards 240p forum where people embrace the beauty of the phosphors (or pixels in our case):
Here’s a good example from @oscartilheiro:
5 Likes
I’ll try and do some eyeballing distance tests on my CRT tomorrow (aka when I wake up)
Ik when I used it the other night, I was still able to distinguish scanlines pretty easily at 4+ feet away from my CRT. (Which was kinda surprising no cap, mask went bye bye tho at that distance, which not a surprise)
I’d take pictures, but my cameras are too potatoe atm, or I would.
1 Like
Although you may not directly be able to distinguish the mask I’m pretty sure you’d be able to tell the difference between a screen with no mask and one with a mask from the other side of a large room - a good few meters away. Your visual system is pretty good at seeing detail from a distance even if it’s ‘averaged’ a bit and you find you can’t quite put your finger on whats different.
3 Likes
Ohh for sure, you can definitely “notice” the mask, but you can’t make any details out.
1 Like
Isn’t this the same or at least very similar to Lottes just rotated? If so, won’t it suffer from some of the issues that led to the use of a rotated slot mask in Lottes in the first place?
1 Like
Are you talking about the horizontally stretched dotmask (not sure why it’s called “rotated” but whatever)?
If so, this is pretty different- hunterk has a good closeup of the stretched/rotated Lottes mask on his now-famous write-up. The “issues” as I see it would be a noticeable color shift (I think it’s green?) due to irregular subpixel spacing and noticeable black gaps between subpixels. The former is more of an issue IMO, I can never get the colors/brightness etc quite right. It’s much easier to get mask 0 looking good in terms of color/brightness (standard or staggered).
The magenta-green checkerboard avoids the issues with the stretched dotmask, it looks very legit. I was going to say that the dotmask is almost more convincing than the aperture grille because it plays nicer with the LCD grid.
3 Likes