If you go back through the post over the years you will see that my resistance to doing this kind of thing is nothing new.
Talk about my MAME design was one of earliest subjects of conversation.
The MAME cabinet was never intended to be a “Generic” cabinet that could be customized. I just did the work for @akuma22’s project.
Even the “Arcade” and “FB-Neo” versions were done by request only.
@HyperspaceMadness and I have talked about working on a “Cabinet” version of the shader. I have done some test versions of a generic cabinet.
I have even received permission from a photographer on Tumblr to use his work as backgrounds.
There is a reason the “Cabinet Glass” image layer has it’s name, and cropping glass art is what the “Cutout” feature is intended for. The team has not forgotten the arcade users.
Features to aid in this kind of setup are on the table but it is a long way off. (Inner and outer shadows on the “Cutout”, ambient screen reflections on the cabinet sides and/or control panel etc.)
The Mega Bezel has been in development for almost three years. Who knows what will happen in the next three.
To sum things up I am not against an artist picking up where @akuma22 left off. I am not entirely against doing the work myself… but I have already done most of the hard work.
To further aid in customizing the preset I can separate the background layer, speakers, and glass from the rest… but that is all I am willing to do in the near future.
The Mega Bezel was designed for artists… not just one artist. At some point, my doing all the work will become a handicap, not a benefit.