"unofficial" cores

from time to time i run across some unofficial cores like this

my question is now is there somewhere a list with all of them or does anybody know more please let me know ?

1 Like

There’s no central authority that determines who can make a libretro core, so, no there’s no definitive list.

I stumble upon new ones semi-frequently myself :slight_smile:

2 Likes

maybe we should collect them here anywhere or in these thread i mean its intressting at least ^^

this is the only one i just have mind , there where more i found over the years but i forgot the name and never tried them

What’s the usage of this? It launches the standalone Dolphin? If that’s the case why not just use the standalone directly?

i guess for people that wanna use retroarch like launchbox to get their emulators all in one app

According to forum, there is mention of “unofficial cores” but no specific list of all of them is mentioned in the search results. The mentioned GitHub repository, https://github.com/SwedishGojira/libretro-bash-launcher/, is a specific example of one of these unofficial cores.

@Drybonz

i think this is a good place to post it , and we don´t derail a thread for it if we discuss this here^^

i going to test it today

1 Like

Hi!

I’m new to the libretro community and I was wondering if there is a formal process/document outlining how to submit a new core?

The reason I’s asking is because I have just created a core for my IBM 5150/5160 emulator. Core builds can be downloaded here and source code is on GitHub.

It would be cool if I could make it easier for people to find and use.

6 Likes

oh, that’s awesome!

To get it into the online updater, we need it to have a recipe to build on our CI infrastructure in the top-level of the source tree and a core info file submitted to the ‘libretro-super’ repo on github.

Are you on discord? If so, the user BoardsOfCanada on there can probably help you get the CI stuff squared away. For the core info stuff I’m happy to help with, but you can pretty much just go down the line with this annotated skeleton and fill in what applies: https://github.com/libretro/libretro-super/blob/master/dist/info/00_example_libretro.info

2 Likes

I had to boot off of a PC-DOS disk, swap disks, and manually run the executable. But I managed it with my first try.

Nice work @phix !!!

It will be nice to have a dedicated core to go along with my 5150 Presets. :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:

6 Likes

so i was wondering if is kinda like dosbox or not but seems this just emulates the hardware…

hmmm then i have to visit my dad and get the old pc-booter games that don´t need dos :sweat_smile:

1 Like

I think I still have the discs for Starflight around here somewhere. I think it ran straight from the discs. Can’t remember.

besides pc.man i don´t know wich other pc-booter games i had a few thats sure , just know that everything is still safe by my dad in the basement :sweat_smile:

Hi, thanks!

I’ll reach out in Discord then. :slight_smile: I do have a .info file here that I created. I don’t think RetroArch is happy without one? Had problems loading content without it.

1 Like

There is also support for running and executing files directly from your host systems disk. But it is not included in the core. I felt like the disc swapping system is more tailored towards consoles like the Playstation etc. (make sense I guess :smiley: )

I thought of supporting ZIP files as a compliment to the raw IMG files in the core instead of mounting a host folder like the standalone emulator does. That could perhaps work better with the Libretro way of handling “discs”.

It would work something like the setup I have on this site.

If the zip file could contain extracted floppy contents, compatibility would be greatly improved. I am having a tough time curating a solid set of contents. Seems disk size is really important in the RAW images.

Also. Does the standalone support multiple floppy drives? Many games require a B: drive for user data.

The standalone emulator comes with a default freedos harddrive for ease of use. So you have your A: drive free, as well as Z: mapped (read only by default) to your working directory or a path specified with the --rifs parameter.

Technically the emulator supports multiple drives. But I’m not sure if the B: drive is exposed in the UI at this point. I was not aware of any software requiring two drives? (I will create an issue for adding support in the UI.)

For the libretro core it is a little harder though, since I don’t think there is a concept of multiple drives.

1 Like

Yeah, maybe not in the UI, I don’t know. MAME and DOSBox both support multiple floppies from the command line or config file. (dosbox.conf)

This sounds very convenient, and would probably negate the need for a B: drive.

From what I remember, it was never “required” only more convenient. I only asked because it came up in my testing in the last 24 hours. (Bard’s Tale 1)

BTW. I never loved a HDD More than my first WD 20MB MFM.

1 Like

It will be nice to have a dedicated core to go along with my 5150 Presets. :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:

I did not read the last line of your post properly! When I glanced at your post earlier I just thought that was a picture of your real machine. :smiley: Looks amazing!

This is one of the reasons I want to support a libretro core for my emulator.

4 Likes

Thank you!

In case you have never seen the night version.

Sure is great not to have to mess with DOSBox configs to get a CGA display!

Although I’m not 100% sure the IBM 5153 monitor supported CGA. :innocent:

I may have to do some research and add another version to my graphics pack.

Edit: The 5153 was a CGA display. The 5154 was EGA and had different colored knobs and additional text on the badge.

Looks like I have a small project in the near future. The VGA 5175 was indistinguishable (Except for more badge changes.) so the graphic will be a 2 for 1.

Thanks for the inspiration!

4 Likes