New CRT shader from Guest + CRT Guest Advanced updates

Syh · 5 May 2022 07:07

Ruins is a tad dramatic, and it seriously depends on how much noise we’re adding to the image, I’m literally suggesting just one or two notches of it. (Barely going to affect the black levels, it definitely will but w/e).

I understand what you’re complaining about as I’ve personally dealt with it myself, I just don’t care

Rincewind · 5 May 2022 07:06

Depends on how you do it, it doesn’t have to be.

Just tried it quickly in Photoshop with some gaussian BW noise on a mid-gray layer added with Overlay mode at 50% opacity. That leaves the blacks and the overall luminance 100% intact, it only disturbs the luminance of a few pixels a little. It’s quite nice, indeed @Syh, thanks for the tip! It breaks up the synthetic look even more, which makes sense, nothing is 100% perfect in manufacturing in real life. Now I’ll only need to find a way how replicate this with some ReShade filter as the last layer Any tips? I guess some simple shader will do that can overlay any texture with pixel-perfect mapping with some PS overlay-like blending.

RealNC · 5 May 2022 07:44

I believe they meant the shader option for noise. If it’s available in the winuae version, of course.

0 noise. The black around the shader output is the same as the black inside the shader output:

Noise set to 0.3. The black inside the shader output is not really black:

Some people like this effect though. It makes the image look similar to what a CRT looks when you view it in a lit room. (The light reflects off the CRT screen and it’s not black anymore.)

Rincewind · 5 May 2022 07:52

Cheers, it’s not bad, but I find the noise a bit too much personally. What I’ve done in literally 2 minutes is:

create new layer in PS, fill with 128 gray
Filter -> Add Noise -> Gaussian / 4% / Monochromatic
Blend 40%, Overlay blend mode

That’s it, I find the effect quite nice. Should be dead easy to do in a ReShade shader (no, the WinUAE shaders don’t have built-in noise functionality). The PS blend modes are documented here, it doesn’t seem too heavy calculation wise, it just screws around with the sRGB pixels like half of the PS blend modes… I might even implement myself if I don’t find something that does it already.

(Target > 0.5) * (1 - (1-2*(Target-0.5)) * (1-Blend)) + (Target <= 0.5) * ((2*Target) * Blend)

https://www.deepskycolors.com/archivo/2010/04/21/formulas-for-Photoshop-blending-modes.html

Rincewind · 5 May 2022 08:03

Lo and behold, good things come to those who can use Google

Overlay formula

github.com

prod80/prod80-ReShade-Repository/blob/master/Shaders/PD80_00_Blend_Modes.fxh#L75=


}

float3 darken(float3 c, float3 b)       { return min(c,b);}
float3 multiply(float3 c, float3 b) 	{ return c*b;}
float3 linearburn(float3 c, float3 b) 	{ return max(c+b-1.0f,0.0f);}
float3 colorburn(float3 c, float3 b)    { return b<=0.0f ? b:saturate(1.0f-((1.0f-c)/b)); }
float3 lighten(float3 c, float3 b) 		{ return max(b,c);}
float3 screen(float3 c, float3 b) 		{ return 1.0f-(1.0f-c)*(1.0f-b);}
float3 colordodge(float3 c, float3 b) 	{ return b>=1.0f ? b:saturate(c/(1.0f-b));}
float3 lineardodge(float3 c, float3 b) 	{ return min(c+b,1.0f);}
float3 overlay(float3 c, float3 b) 		{ return c<0.5f ? 2.0f*c*b:(1.0f-2.0f*(1.0f-c)*(1.0f-b));}
float3 softlight(float3 c, float3 b) 	{ return b<0.5f ? (2.0f*c*b+c*c*(1.0f-2.0f*b)):(sqrt(c)*(2.0f*b-1.0f)+2.0f*c*(1.0f-b));}
float3 vividlight(float3 c, float3 b) 	{ return b<0.5f ? colorburn(c,(2.0f*b)):colordodge(c,(2.0f*(b-0.5f)));}
float3 linearlight(float3 c, float3 b) 	{ return b<0.5f ? linearburn(c,(2.0f*b)):lineardodge(c,(2.0f*(b-0.5f)));}
float3 pinlight(float3 c, float3 b) 	{ return b<0.5f ? darken(c,(2.0f*b)):lighten(c, (2.0f*(b-0.5f)));}
float3 hardmix(float3 c, float3 b)      { return vividlight(c,b)<0.5f ? float3(0.0,0.0,0.0):float3(1.0,1.0,1.0);}
float3 reflect(float3 c, float3 b)      { return b>=1.0f ? b:saturate(c*c/(1.0f-b));}
float3 glow(float3 c, float3 b)         { return reflect(b,c);}
float3 blendhue(float3 c, float3 b)         { return blendColor(b,c,c);}
float3 blendsaturation(float3 c, float3 b)  { return blendColor(c,b,c);}
float3 blendcolor(float3 c, float3 b)       { return blendLuma(b,c);}

A texture based Gaussian noise sampler

github.com

prod80/prod80-ReShade-Repository/blob/master/Shaders/PD80_00_Noise_Samplers.fxh

/*
 *  Shared textures across shaders by prod80
 *  Required for proper effect execution
 */

// Textures
texture texNoise        < source = "pd80_bluenoise.png"; >       { Width = 512; Height = 512; Format = RGBA8; };
texture texNoiseRGB     < source = "pd80_bluenoise_rgba.png"; >  { Width = 512; Height = 512; Format = RGBA8; };
texture texGaussNoise   < source = "pd80_gaussnoise.png"; >      { Width = 512; Height = 512; Format = RGBA8; };

// Samplers
sampler samplerNoise
{ 
    Texture = texNoise;
    MipFilter = POINT;
    MinFilter = POINT;
    MagFilter = POINT;
    AddressU = WRAP;
    AddressV = WRAP;
    AddressW = WRAP;

This file has been truncated. show original

Now it only takes some hackery

I’m pretty sure Guest’s version simply just adds the noise, hence the raised black floor. So maybe overlay blend mode could be made an option (I used overlay blend mode a lot when dodging/burning photos… if the overlay layer is “centered” around a 128 grey then it maintains the luminance in plain old RGB mode even).

Duimon · 5 May 2022 10:24

I asked @HyperspaceMadness for an Overlay blend mode in the Mega Bezel way back when and he ran into a roadblock. (I’m not sure where.)

If you could make it work maybe it would solve some masking issues I’m having with the HDR shaders.

Cyber · 5 May 2022 13:32

I’ve mentioned this several times before, and this is from experience and testing.

You can’t illustrate GDV noise using screenshots or any freeze frame, including pausing the emulator due to its temporal nature. The image wouldn’t look anything like it does when the game/emulation is running.

You might instead have to use video clips with the proper encoding settings so as to be able to preserve the fine details of the noise or maybe a photograph of the screen that has the appropriate shutter settings in order to capture all phases of the noise.

Any other way will be presenting an image that is most likely missing data that will be displayed in subsequent frames or were displayed in previous frames.

For some strange reason I’m not noticing this raised black floor at all in any of my presets, of which the majority use a tiny amount of GDV Noise.

Perhaps I’m doing something “wrong” ?

RealNC · 5 May 2022 14:08

I was just showing the black level issue. Not the noise itself.

hunterk · 5 May 2022 14:23

the black level (and/or general color quality) is why I prefer the noise to happen in the texture coordinate instead of just adding/multiplying/whatever random values per pixel. This kind of noise more closely mimics the movement/“sparkle” I see in the scanlines of my own CRTs. I think doing luma-only noise (simulated film grain) usually looks better than RGB noise, too, unless you’re trying to imitate actual static/interference.

See the noise I added to crtglow to help with the moire as an example of the texcoord-type noise (enable curvature and then set both x/y values to 0.0 and the noise to 0.5-0.75; the default 1.0 is too heavy for a flat image IMO)

HyperspaceMadness · 5 May 2022 14:25

Yeah I think it would be relatively straightforward to apply the noise like that with a middle gray, and have everything under middle applied as darkening and everything above adding white

Cyber · 5 May 2022 15:14

I really meant illustrating anything involving GDV Noise. The image in the screenshot or paused emulator wouldn’t really be representative of what the user would see, including black levels.

bradley1492 · 6 May 2022 13:14

Hello, a few days ago I switched to glsl from slang. Now I stumbled upon the gdv-mini shader. Is the concept behind that shader to be even faster than the gdv-fast preset?

Cyber · 6 May 2022 15:07

I’m not sure if that was the original concept or just a side effect but you can probably ask @DariusG as he’s the person behind it.

DariusG · 6 May 2022 14:38

Yeah it’s a lot faster, I tweaked it so it works fast enough on some weak devices I had around, without dropping much features (curvature, masks, etc).

bradley1492 · 6 May 2022 14:45

Alright. Thanks for the modification/sshader/preset love it.

guest.r · 7 May 2022 16:58

New Release Version (2022-05-07-r1):

Notable changes:

contrast option added
alternate “negative” bloom changed
noise is now correctly removed outside the screen with curvature enabled
new ‘luma’ multiplicative noise option added

Download link:

https://mega.nz/file/VoQyna4b#GCyjh5xHWeehCzDGqA-MbQ8yJYO4C1lQmqQCsGiYYvw

sonkun · 8 May 2022 02:17

That alternate bloom and luma noise option looks interesting, gonna look into both of those and see what I can come up with. I already see the alternate bloom gives colors an extra punch and a little more brightness, I like what the luma noise does as well but I see you can’t use too much of it or it’ll be overwhelming. This should be fun to play with

guest.r · 13 May 2022 07:04

New Release Version (2022-05-13-r1):

Notable changes:

ringing option added to be used with substractive sharpness, sharpness ‘feel’ can be very increased
ntsc-fast blend mode 1.0 greatly improved, preset also changed
edit: small sharpness tweak

Download link:

https://mega.nz/file/cgQHHYLY#EXZ_muEnJG0nhSGtbDQ5jawU7yylXn9MyYJpM84ATv4

saeedalshaikhpygas · 13 May 2022 09:28

As always , thanks for all of your work guest. I been thinking if it would be possible to increase the sharpness without reverting back to the pixelated state on edges , curtsy of r/CRTgaming

a shot of BVM

perhaps because I’m using 4k 65 inch tv so pixel density isn’t om side

Also In the image , mask has no tint effect on colors. From what I can see the colors are almost 1:1 with no shader . I have a sony x950g which according to Rtings has BGR subpixel layout.

But enabling the BGR in the shader mask parameters would actually tint the colors more.

guest.r · 13 May 2022 15:26

You can adjust the “Scanline spike removal” parameter for the scanline edge effect which you wanna have.

I would suggest mask 6.0 where you can decrease the main mask strength value for a pure scanline look. The saturated borders of the scanlines can be achieved with the “scanline saturation” parameter.

For this looks is also important that you play with other scanline shape parameters a bit.

Parameter settings:

gamma_c = "1.200000"
gsl = "2.000000"
scanline2 = "20.000000"
beam_min = "1.999999"
beam_max = "0.950000"
beam_size = "0.250000"
scans = "1.999999"
scan_falloff = "0.500000"
spike = "0.300000"
s_sharp = "0.400000"
shadowMask = "6.000000"
maskstr = "0.100000"
mcut = "1.200000"
mask_layout = "1.000000"
post_br = "1.100000"