@guest.r do you remember what color palette was used in the shot you posted recently? That may be the missing ingredient.
3 Likes
It should be Sony CXAâŚi compared it with the screenie. I also cranked up the contrast to get more intensive artifacting, remember now.
3 Likes
Many PC Engine games employ all sorts of dithering. Not sure if they would have appeared transparent or fully blended over a composite input like the Sega Genesis though because the output was clean and many times high res. The PC Engine used high res modes a lot in games compared to the Sega Genesis and SNES.
So in many cases you might just see the dither patterns depending on the screen used, input I guess (I only used composite) and viewing distance. It wouldnât appear as harsh as in DOS games on a VGA/SVGA monitor though because weâre using composite on a TV/Commodore Monitor but dithering was very common as far as I know on the PC-Engine/TurboGrafx-16/Turbo Duo.
My latest shader preset and video filter combination blends a lot of the dithering without sacrificing the resolution and sharpness though. This can be seen in the blue gradient behind Esty in the Gate Of Thunder intro and in other areas and games as well.
Youâll still see the dither patterns in other areas of the intro like on Hawkâs gloved index finger.
But you canât go around using the same levels of de-dithering/softening/NTSCing for PC Engine as you do with Sega Genesis. Things like text will quickly begin to appear unbecoming of the Turbo, while the Genesis will tend to be much more forgiving.
I canât remember ever seeing rainbow banding on a PC Engine (TurboGrafx-16/Turbo Duo) game in real life. I canât even remember seeing it on Sega Genesis but those memories would be even more faded than my TurboGrafx-16/Turbo Duo ones. Maybe I just didnât notice the rainbow effect on Genesis
As for PC Engine, I remember how clean it was on my Commodore 1702. That mask pattern was beautiful on such a small, high quality screen.
Some more examples of dithering on the PC-Engine:
Some videos showing PC-Engine Games running on CRT Displays:
Very useful and important information about how the PC Engine produces its colours:
This is also a good Resource if you would like to browse the PCE Library and see which games use dithering:
http://www.pcengine.co.uk/HTML_A-Z_Pages/A.htm
Many of the posts have gameplay and longplay videos.
http://www.pcengine.co.uk/HTML_Games/Addams_Family.htm
Misc. Turbo Stuff that I found interesting:
Seeing some slight rainbow artifacts/fringing going on on some edges of pixels here, especially on top right right edges of round shapes or shapes with diagonal edges particularly during right to left scrolling.
Video uploaded said he just has the composite out of the Turbo Duo hooked up to the capture card.
2 Likes
Regarding composite, PC Engine has the same problems Genesis has. Not that terrible, but itâs the same phase, so image quality and colours both get a blow.
3 Likes
I think to suggest that the PC Engine has the same problems the Genesis has might be a bit of an oversimplification which can lead to misunderstanding.
I think that the Genesis has some problems and characteristics of its own which are unique to it and not present on the PC Engine.
If it were a case of sameness as described in your post then the two machines wouldnât have such vast differences in Composite video quality.
The article even talks about the colourburst averaging which improves image quality.
NES
âThese donât look so bad in composite, thanks in a large part to the colour burst averaging that happens between successive frames on the NES/Famicom/SFC/PCE. Still, colours become faded and much less distinct.â
NEC PC-Engine
"We can see that the PCEâs output is pretty good as far as bold colour fidelity goes. Many of the shots below display very fine details in RGB that are even carried over in composite. The major noticeable difference, however, is the different colour balancing and component weighting which is a function of the PCE VCEâs composite encoder.
Well, enough praise. With Daimakaimura, we can see that the 320-pixel mode of the PCE produces more blurring and NTSC artifacts which degrade the image quality somewhat. Also, thereâs still some unavoidable loss of colour definition in composite. For example, did you notice that in the Doraemon pic Nobita-kun has a bleeding knuckle? Itâs very hard to notice this with the PCEâs composite."
Sega Master System
âSegaâs 8-bit system is pretty notorious for its poor video quality. It smudges horizontal details all to hell, and introduces colour fringing and rainbows even in areas that contain only black & white!â
SNK Neo Geo
âAnyway, the NGâs composite video is just horrible. Itâs a bit dark and muddy, even greyscale graphics get significantly blurred, and thereâs a horrible checkerboard interference pattern around strong colours.â
Sega Mega Drive
âThe Mega Drive gets its own page because of its notoriously bad composite video. Once I set up my digitizing equipment and took snapshots of a few games, I just got carried away and took pics of many of my favourite games. Or, I took pics of especially egregious examples of just how much the MD muddles, blurs, and confounds the composite video display to the dismay of its hapless users.â
Excerpts taken from article below.
https://www.chrismcovell.com/gotRGB/rgb_compare2.html
Your post has me slightly confused.
Are you sure you donât mean the Genesis, Sega Master System and Neo Geo suffer from the same problems? What problems are you referring to in particular?
1 Like
" we can see that the 320-pixel mode of the PCE produces more blurring and NTSC artifacts which degrade the image quality somewhat. Also, thereâs still some unavoidable loss of colour definition in composite"
Exactly this. Itâs phase 2 NTSC, the same of Genesis, and it has that kind of problem. Saturn has that problem, too, same resolution. For example the same doesnât occur (at least not with the same result) on SNES, which is phase 3 NTSC, as it has a 256 pixel output.
But thereâs a catch. On PC Engine games used a variety of resolutions, and itâs undocumented which used what (like, you donât have a list). Some say only a few used 320px, others say the majority of the library used something higher than 256, Wikipedia says most used exactly 256, so who knows.
In my experience the issue stated above is something Iâve noticed when playing PC Engine games, as I noticed it on Genesis and Saturn, and thatâs why I use Sonkunâs presets on those platforms, as MAME NTSC is âagnosticâ, while guestâs NSTC use the exact phase. I should check if it depends on some setting in the emu, though, maybe it forces a 320 pixel output (but I donât tink so).
3 Likes
Most PCE games are 256 width, but indeed some use other resolutions, but they also sometimes switch resolution mid-frame. For example, thereâs some ultima-style RPG that draws the top of the screen at 256 and the bottom text area at 320(?). On a real CRT, this doesnât matter, but itâs very difficult for us to deal with properly.
4 Likes
I went through all replies here, @Cyber thank you for the video links. I ended up going by what @guest.r said up above and measured these systems by the âphaseâ system. I went and loaded up all the main old systems even the unpopular ones then loaded up guestâs ntsc shader since it chooses the correct ntsc phase per system automatically with that adaptive ntsc shader added in and this is the list I came up:
Systems that use 2phase ntsc:
Atari 5200, Atari 7800, Atari Jaguar, Sega Megadrive, Nintendo 64, Neo Geo CD, NEC PC Engine/CD/Super Grafx, Panasonic 3DO, Philips CDi, Sony PlayStation, Sega Saturn.
Systems that use 3phase ntsc:
Atari 2600, Nintendo, Sega Master System, Super Nintendo.
My composite preset is pretty much a hybrid mix of a phase 2 ntsc shader that gives you phase 2 ntsc rainbow effects with the vibrant colors you get from phase 3 ntsc instead of the washed out colors you authentically get from phase 2 but without the correct rainbow effects you get from phase 3.
So with all that information my preset covers all the phase 2 based systems as far as rainbow banding goes, however I donât get the same authentic rainbow banding for those 4 systems above I mentioned that use phase 3 ntsc like we see in the Ninja Gaiden pics above (my composite presets doesnât produce those thin diagonal rainbow effects).
Now my next question I need to ask myself is it worth going out of the way to re arrange my whole preset pack to add in a âphase 3â composite preset for just 4 systems that have different rainbow effects? Perhaps. And thatâs where Iâm at so far in this conversation. Decisions decisions lol.
@Fab the good (or bad depending on how look at it) thing about that mame ntsc shader is that it allows you to make that same authentic washed out look you get from a phase 2 ntsc signal but who wants washed out colors? I guess thatâs where I drew the line of trying to look too âauthenticâ thatâs why my presets ended up looking the way they look.
4 Likes
I donât think authentic means a player would have had a washed out experience by using composite or even a blurry experience. TVâs had sharpening circuitry and besides that things just ended up being sharper on a CRT TV than on our modern displays using shaders. filters and upscalers (as @Nesguy has been so painstakingly demonstrated to us).
TVs also had colour, picture, sharpness, brightness, contrast and tint controls.
I would think that if a user found their games to be looking washed out that they would just turn up the colour and adjust the brightness.
I doubt many if any of us had colorimeters or professional calibration software or even knew what calibration was in the 80s and 90s. Yet we seem to have some who are obsessed with perfect colour accuracy today. I find that a bit strange.
2 Likes
I shouldâve clarified in my last post, I meant authentic as far as ntsc phase 2 looks in the adaptive shader default settings. I know you can tweak the ntsc settings in that shader but that wasnât my point. I donât have a crt or real hardware to go off of so Iâm kind of forced to reference pics/videos online and ntsc shaders available on RetroArch. That adaptive ntsc shader seems to be the best one available so I used that as my main source in my last post.
2 Likes
I understood this. My comments were just a generalization based on my observation of the state of things over the past couple of years. Not really directed at you in particular. I just used your comment as a point of reference.
1 Like
If you read this guide, the implication is that composite on the Genesis / Megadrive can be quite different depending on the model.
Using the 32x will also alter the composite output completely, because it converts from RGB. These kind of differences are probably not uncommon across hardware and signals, e.g. SNES 1 Chip vs 2 Chip RGB.
5 Likes
This is good olâ Blargg NTSC Composite from the Nestopia Core Options plus one of my latest CRT Shader Presets. I wish I could tweak those Blargg settings in the Core Options.
1 Like
You should try out the âCompositeâ shader pass from the âcrtsimâ shader, I gutted that pass out of that shader and made my new âcomposite ntsc 3-phaseâ shader preset with that thatâs in my latest shader pack. Came out pretty nice and it has a good number of settings you can tweak, looks very similar to the Blargg filter here you should check it out.
2 Likes
Wow! More stuff to learnâŚlol. Iâve never strung together different shaders before. Iâm sure I can learn how to it if necessary though. My time to do this is quite limited though so Iâm not sure when Iâll be able to try it out.
I originally returned to these forums looking for a replacement bezel, shaders and shader presets for the Analog Shader Pack 3.0. I found them all in the same place with HSM Mega Bezel Reflection Shader, I really donât want to play without those amazing reflective bezels anymore.
Maybe someday, Iâll experiment and explore other shaders.
Is this CRTSIM shader different from the MAME shader that you combined with CRT-Guest-Advanced-HD?
If so, why did you choose it over the MAME shader?
1 Like
Yeah I learned tricks like that from the user Syh (@Syh where the hell you dissapeared to man?? Youâre missing out on all these new upgraded shaders here), he also taught me about the greatness of the grade shader too so I guess heâs kind of the reason for me even forming these presets.
Yeah itâs kind of different as far as customization, it does an amazing 3-phase ntsc output, I didnât tweak it to try and make a 2-phase ntsc output so I donât know how it does in that area though.
Good question. Quite simply because the mame ntsc wasnât giving me satisfying results no matter which way I tweaked it. Thereâs a setting on the old mame ntsc version called âSignal Offsetâ which when itâs turned on it seems to just blend everything perfectly with a little jitter added in, it works perfect for recreating the 2-phase signal but when I turned that setting off to try and make a 3-phase signal it changes the whole picture in a way where pixels look somewhat distorted at least to me.
So I ended up ditching that and went looking at every other ntsc shader available to merge into my preset, I tried them all and just wasnât hitting that sweet spot and then I stumbled upon that composite pass by random that was used in a whole different shader. I traced the original location of that pass back to the crtsim shader then I proceeded to perform my operation and here we are lol.
1 Like
Same phase but PC-Engine averages colourburst aka merges fields like NES and SNES while Genesis does not merge fields.
1 Like